Reports

Spontaneous Waves and Dissipation

To identify spontaneously emitted waves in a more or less realistic setting I use a high resolution global ocean model.

Thomas Reitz, PhD L2

Hi, my name is Thomas, I am a PhD Student in subproject L2 “The interior energy pathway: internal wave emission by quasi-balanced flows” at the Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology. This project tries to answer the question to what extend spontaneous wave generation contributes to the ocean’s route to dissipation.

The ocean’s route to dissipation is not yet fully understood. Both the large-scale currents and the meso-scale eddies in the ocean are essentially balanced. Moreover, those eddies tend to transfer energy upward towards larger scales. So the question arises how the energy is transported from the large scales to the small scales, where the energy can be dissipated. Spontaneously emitted waves can be refracted by the eddying flow and captured later. Wave capture is a possible way to transfer energy to smaller scales. I am contributing to this question by identifying spontaneously emitted waves in an OGCM.

To identify spontaneously emitted waves in a more or less realistic setting I use a high resolution global ocean model. The model runs in two configurations: One is a realistic setting forced by 6-hourly atmospheric fluxes obtained by reanalysis data and a second one with temporally constant forcing. By comparing the two simulations I found wavelike structures which are not generated by external forcing but by the eddying flows itself. The properties of these structures identify them as gravity waves which are likely to be generated by spontaneous emission. Further analysis may show to what extend these waves contribute to the ocean’s route to dissipation.

Balance-imbalance decomposition of the flow field

We are currently working on application of the optimal balance algortihm to the shallow water model and the primitve equations will follow.

Gökce Tuba Masur, PhD in L2

I am a PhD student in the subproject L2 at Jacobs University Bremen under supervision of Prof. Marcel Oliver.

Our role in the subproject can be briefly explained as follows: In large-scale ocean models, the ocean circulations are essentially balanced; however, this balance breaks down in small scales due to spontaneous generation of inertia-gravity waves by quasi-balanced circulations, and waves are maybe re-captured in later times. This spontaneous emission and wave capture is considered to contribute to the energy transfer from the essentially balanced large-scale circulation and mesoscale eddy fields down to smaller scales, which is a route to dissipation.

To analyse the role of inertia-gravity waves in interior dissipation, a reasonable approach is to diagnose the inertia-gravity waves by splitting the flow field into balance and imbalance components, which are the ocean circulation and the inertia-gravity waves, respectively. This balance-imbalance decomposition can be achieved by some diagnostic tools such as linear time filters, balance relations, and optimal potential vorticity balance. In this project, we want to provide a new numerical algorithm to separate spontaneously generated imbalanced flows from the vertical flows depending on a prior work called „optimal balance“.

We are currently working on application of the optimal balance algorithm to the shallow water model and the primitive equations will follow. The “optimal balance” algorithm is interesting to us not only for practical aspects but also mathematical features, so that we extensively worked on asymptotics-preserving schemes on a finite dimensional model in the algorithm. There are several other theoretically open questions, which are standing for the algorithm as its existence and uniqueness, to be considered.

Investigating eddy diffusivitites and eddy-mean flow interactions

Our observational data will serve the model as a reference that includes smaller scales that the model is not able to cover.

Julia Dräger-Dietel, Postdoc in L3

In September 2016 I started working as a postdoctoral researcher in the subproject L3 Diagnosing and parameterising the effects of eddies at the Universität Hamburg with Kerstin Jochumsen from Experimental Oceanography and Alexa Griesel from Theoretical Oceanography. Having a background in nonlinear dynamics and statistical physics in application to complex systems, I am strongly attracted by the aim of our research project and by the possibility to work within an inspiring interdisciplinary research network as created by the TRR181 with its great possibilities for exchange with scientists of different fields.

A major link to my former research consists in the analysis of trajectories (derived from in situ experiments or modeled by stochastic processes) and more specifically the analysis of broad (non Gaussian) Langrangian statistics of absolute and relative dispersion. The goal of our research subproject L3 is the quantification of eddy diffusivities and eddy-mean flow interactions by using Langrangian particles statistics in both eddying ocean models and observations. Its aim is to develop and to test energy consistent parameterisations of meso- and sub-mesoscale processes for the global ocean with a focus on 100 km -1 km scales.

At the beginning I developed and tested float deployment strategies by means of the high resolution POP model. In November/December 2016 our cruise with the RV Meteor took place in the atlantic-sea off the african coast. The cold upwelling front off Namibia's coast in the area of Luderitz has a highly irregular structure due to eddies and filaments, finger-like structures of cold upwelling water pushing west into the warm surface waters offshore (see Figure 1). In our field experiment we explored mesoscale and submesoscale structures within a filament by satellite-tracking 37 surface drifters which we released in groups of triplets. As a first result we find that, due to the underlying rich mesoscale system, the dispersion statistics are very different depending on the location of release. While the drifters of the group released at the southern border of the filament separate slower (Figure 2a), the drifters in the group released closer to the upwelling system at the northern border of the filament separate faster from each other and follow distinct paths within the complex surface currents (Figure 2b). Currently our research focuses on the relative dispersion of drifter pairs (and its corresponding probability density function) as its properties depend on the kinetic energy spectrum. The statistical analyzing of single particle dispersion and the comparison of our findings with dispersion statistics of ocean model will be a next step. Here our observational data will serve the model as a reference that includes smaller scales that the model is not able to cover.

More Information about the research cruise on RV Meteor (M132) including reports, posters and videos of the scientific work have a look have a look at our TRR181 homepage.

Figure 1. Namibia from satellite. The blue colors show the cold upwelling area off Lüderitz and a cold filament (green and yellow).
Figure 2a
Figure 2b